Water is Worth More Than Gold

Pollution, Chemtrails, Vaccinations, etc.
Gnosty
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 551
Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 20:20
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Water is Worth More Than Gold

Postby Gnosty » 07 Feb 2004, 15:40

Most people take water for granted. In so-called "modern" and "industrialized" nations, water is controlled by government, and this is no mistake on their part. Without water biological life ceases, from the simplest crop to humanity itself. Our bodies consist of more water than any other substance, just as do most crops we eat.

First of all, water is a money business. Secondly, he who controls the water controls the people. Most incorporated towns and counties in the corporate U.S. Federal States have ordinances against having your own water well. Why? Because they can't make money from you if you have your own water supply, and they can't control you if you have no dependency on them for water - the literal water of life for all living things.

Most towns and counties have banned new water wells and septic sytems based on their own internal assessment of associated "health hazards". Now, that's really ironic considering that the average well water (when dug to the proper depth for the specific land it is on) has less poisons and impurities than any chlorinated and flouridated community water system. Did any of these "officials" bother to find out that chemical flouride and chlorine are deadly poisons?

I have a friend in Missouri who has a natural year-round water spring on his land. His water was tested and found to be full of good colloidal trace minerals, no poisons, no harmful bacteria, nor anything else harmful.

I have somewhat shallow (80-90 ft.) water wells with reverse osmosis (RO) systems on my own houses in Florida and the Dominican. My water was tested at both locations and found to be void of any poisons, pollutants, or harmful microbes. The only drawback with reverse osmosis is the removal of good minerals from the water.

There is no comparison between deep sourced natural water supplies or properly filtered water (RO) with poisonous community "treated" water.

Chlorine and Your Drinking Water ~ Here's What The Experts Have To Say:

"The drinking of chlorinated water has finally been officially linked to an increased incidence of colon cancer. An epidemiologist at Oak Ridge Associated Universities completed a study of colon cancer victims and non-cancer patients and concluded that the drinking of chlorinated water for 15 years or more was conducive to a high rate of colon cancer." Health Freedom News, January/February 1987

"Long-term drinking of chlorinated water appears to increase a person's risk of developing bladder cancer as much as 80%," according to a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Some 45,000 Americans are diagnosed every year with bladder cancer. St. Paul Dispatch & Pioneer Press, December 17, 1987

"Although concentrations of these carcinogens are low...it is precisely these low levels which cancer scientists believe are responsible for the majority of human cancers in the United States." Report Issued By The Environmental Defense Fund

"Chlorine itself is not believed to be the problem. Scientists suspect that the actual cause of the bladder cancers is a group of chemicals that form as result of reactions between the chlorine and natural substances and pollutants in the water." (organic matter such as leaves and twigs.) St. Paul Dispatch & Pioneer Press, December 17, 1987

Treated Drinking Water Not Safe Enough: Harvard Study Shows Elderly Particularly Sensitive to Waterborne Hazards
"In Boston, ten percent of hospital admissions for people over age 65 for gastrointestinal (GI) illness can be blamed on harmful microbes in drinking water - this in a city with state-of-the-art water treatment - found researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health."

"Philadelphia obtains its drinking water from the highly contaminated rivers that flow through the city and treats that water in sophisticated treatment plants. However, many pathogens known to cause illness are resistant to chlorine, the primary disinfectant used in the plants."
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/press/relea ... 51999.html
Only the harmonics of the LifeCross will bring Living Light to humanity - Michael Edward

Gnosty
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 551
Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 20:20
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Flouridation Does More Damage Than Good

Postby Gnosty » 07 Feb 2004, 15:58

Flouridation Does More Damage Than Good

HICKSVILLE, N.Y., April 23, 2001 /PRNewswire/ -- Fluoridation probably does more damage than good, says a Canadian government report. The best solution is to cease fluoridation, the author suggests.

Dr. David Locker, a University of Toronto dentistry professor, reports "No Canadian studies provide evidence that water fluoridation is effective in reducing (tooth) decay in contemporary child populations." Locker is author of the 2001 "Benefits and Risks of Water Fluoridation," prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Health Canada.

"Current studies support the view that dental fluorosis has increased in both fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities (at)... rates of 20-75% in the former and 12-45% in the latter," Locker reports.

Dental fluorosis -- white spotted, yellow or brown permanently stained and sometimes pitted teeth -- can only be hidden with expensive cosmetic dentistry not usually covered by insurance.

Current fluoridation studies are flawed, reports Locker. Fluoride's
alleged beneficial effects are topical; ingested fluoride causes fluorosis.


Sodium fluoride and silicofluorides are added to 62% of U.S. and 40% of Canadian water supplies to mimic the natural calcium-fluoride community water sources like that of the Southwest U.S.A. where researchers, in the early 1900's, unraveled the epidemic of embarrassingly brown stained teeth, that were curiously decay resistant. Fluoride, the villain that stained teeth, was the assumed cavity fighting superhero.

So, in the late 1940's, officials started adding artificial fluoride to
many U.S. drinking waters to improve America's dental health. A 1981 survey hinted they were already on the wrong track. This National Institutes of Health Survey reported that cavities were still lowest in the Southwest region. Over thirty years of artificial fluoridation across the U.S. should have leveled off decay rates. But it didn't then and it hasn't since.

"We believe the calcium and other, now, well-known bone and teeth building minerals in the water and soils, was responsible for lower decay rates -- not the fluoride," says lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation.

"Fluoridation is a huge dangerous mistake," says Beeber.

"Silicofluorides were never tested for safety in humans or animals, either alone or together with other water additives," says Beeber. "Astonishingly, the silicofluorides are the fertilizer industry's waste product and contain trace amounts of contaminants such as arsenic, mercury, lead and more."

Other findings from the Canadian government report are:

* "Efforts are required to reduce (fluoride) intake among the most vulnerable age groups, children aged 7 months to 4 years..."

* "...data on the effect on health and well-being of the relatively small
decrease in caries rates in children and adolescents currently achieved by water fluoridation is non-existent."

* "Water fluoridation, infant formulas, fluoride supplements and fluoride toothpaste are risk factors of dental fluorosis...The simplest way of reducing the prevalence of fluorosis in child populations is to cease to fluoridate community water supplies."
Only the harmonics of the LifeCross will bring Living Light to humanity - Michael Edward

Gnosty
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 551
Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 20:20
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Postby Gnosty » 08 Feb 2004, 17:33

TROUBLED WATERS

In Washington DC, water safety problems made headlines the summer of 2002. Warm temperatures brought a 'flowering' of bacterial contamination in the corroded city pipe distribution system, Risky drinking water in the nation's capital epitomizes the problems in the productive economy. No longer does the US produce enough to maintain itself. Instead the US and many nations of the world are using the water of those nations where the products are made (outsourced) and which require industrial use of water. Therefore unless a nation's industries manufacture, construct, grow food, and transport adequately, the nation's infrastructure and with it, living standards, decline.

Floods wreak destruction because of lack of river basin projects - dams for storage and for flood mitigation, levees to protect infrastructure. In the US, waterborne diseases such as dysentery, hepatitis, and cholera are spreading. The current rate of pipe replacement by water utilities translates into the prospect of taking more than 200 years to rebuild each area's water distribution system. The problem is that the systems are already in a state of collapse.
Only the harmonics of the LifeCross will bring Living Light to humanity - Michael Edward

CliffMickelson
Guest

And After They Take Your Water....?????

Postby CliffMickelson » 03 Dec 2004, 20:35

Greetings, Gnosty:

Well, in spite of the truths contained in your three posts on this subject, the Federal and State juggernaught rolls on in an inexorable quest to crush the last remaining bastions of free water use among the outlying provincials and stubborn sovereign citizens.

The push to meter all wells, private as well as agricultural, approaches it's triumph here in the West.

All free flowing water has already been expropriated, including natural springs that have been in use by pioneer families for 150 years. Their legitimate pre-statehood and treaty based dominion has been extinguished by a variety of illegal and financial attrition based methods.

The insidious program of "well meters" is firmly established in the Agricultural sector and now begins the slow infiltration of the private domestic use sector.

Makes one wonder how we managed to survive the prior 200 years without such regulation, eh?

Following the triumphant consummation of the water grab movement, I predict that the one primary and sole remaining element yet to be taxed and metered will feel the axe.

Let your children know that someday they will all wear body meters that will regulate and measure the amount of air they breath. What a tax and population control windfall that will be, eh?

You think I exaggerate? I'll take odds with anyone who wants to wager!

-CliffMickelson


Return to “Environmental”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron